Challenges of ERGs • Each manufacturer designs their ERG independently, leading to inconsistencies
in structure, terminology, and graphical presentation. For example, some ERGs
provide detailed step-by-step procedures, while others use minimal text and rely
heavily on visuals.NEXT • Variability Across ManufacturersWhile the intent of ERGs is to streamline emergency responses,
several challenges impact their practical utility, such as:• Icons and symbols may differ, even when representing similar components,
causing potential confusion.Challenges of ERGs • ERGs are not always readily available to all responders, particularly in regions
where repositories are not widely promoted or updated• Access and Availability IssuesNEXT • Some guides are only accessible through proprietary platforms, limiting their
use in time-sensitive emergencies.Challenges of ERGs • Technical gaps in ERGs, such as unclear labeling of components or missing
procedural details, can delay response times and increase risks• Incomplete or Confusing InformationNEXT • Non-standardized terms for identical vehicle systems create confusion,
especially for multi-agency responders working with unfamiliar vehiclesChallenges of ERGs • Despite the presence of ERGs, their utility depends on responders’ familiarity
with the guides. A lack of consistent training on how to interpret and apply
the information in ERGs further limits their effectiveness.• Responder Training Gaps